Trust Index™
Compare betting sites and online casinos on 15 trust signals — licensing, payment reliability, withdrawal performance, complaints, transparency, security and responsible gambling — scored by our editorial team from documented evidence, with the working shown for every operator. It measures how much you should trust an operator with your money, not how large its bonus is.
Every operator with a published review and a Trust Score, ranked highest first. Sort by any dimension, filter to your market, open a full breakdown, and compare up to three side by side. Trust Score and bonus size are different things — see why we keep them apart.
Rank by what matters to you
| Rank | Details | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 StakeVery High Trust | 8.8 /10 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 11 Aug 2026 | ||
 MogoBetHigh Trust | 7.8 /10 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 25 Sept 2026 | ||
 PlayKasinoHigh Trust | 7.8 /10 | 9.5 | 8.5 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 9.5 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 SpinzwinHigh Trust | 7.8 /10 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 25 Sept 2026 | ||
 Monster CasinoHigh Trust | 7.8 /10 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 25 Sept 2026 | ||
 BetmazeHigh Trust | 7.7 /10 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 25 Sept 2026 | ||
 WinissimoHigh Trust | 7.4 /10 | 9.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 Lucky7evenHigh Trust | 7.4 /10 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 18 Aug 2026 | ||
 The Online CasinoHigh Trust | 7.4 /10 | 8.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 4 Sept 2026 | ||
 1xBetHigh Trust | 7.1 /10 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 GranaWinHigh Trust | 7.0 /10 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 12 Aug 2026 | ||
 Lucky VibeModerate Trust | 7.0 /10 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 18 Aug 2026 | ||
 Bluefox casinoModerate Trust | 7.0 /10 | 9.0 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 25 Sept 2026 | ||
 MegapariModerate Trust | 6.9 /10 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 9.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 20BetModerate Trust | 6.9 /10 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 DragonSlotsModerate Trust | 6.9 /10 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 12 Aug 2026 | ||
 Bizzo CasinoModerate Trust | 6.8 /10 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 12 Aug 2026 | ||
 SlotraveModerate Trust | 6.6 /10 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 12 Aug 2026 | ||
 LinebetModerate Trust | 6.5 /10 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 BC.GameModerate Trust | 6.4 /10 | 5.0 | 6.6 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 FortunePlayModerate Trust | 6.4 /10 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 GoldenPlayModerate Trust | 6.4 /10 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 National CasinoModerate Trust | 6.4 /10 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 12 Aug 2026 | ||
 BetrinoModerate Trust | 6.2 /10 | 9.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 22 Sept 2026 | ||
 PlayMojoModerate Trust | 6.2 /10 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 Rooster.BetModerate Trust | 6.2 /10 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 Luna CasinoLimited Data | 6.0 /10 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 MelbetLimited Data | 5.9 /10 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 12 Aug 2026 | ||
 SpinjoLimited Data | 5.8 /10 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 1WinLimited Data | 5.7 /10 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 | ||
 SpinsUPLimited Data | 5.7 /10 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 9 Sept 2026 |
Stake
Very High Trust
8.8
/10
Strength Payment reliability
Watch Licensing
MogoBet
High Trust
7.8
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch Geographic availability
PlayKasino
High Trust
7.8
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch Crypto support
Spinzwin
High Trust
7.8
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch Geographic availability
Monster Casino
High Trust
7.8
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch Geographic availability
Betmaze
High Trust
7.7
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch Geographic availability
Winissimo
High Trust
7.4
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch Crypto support
Lucky7even
High Trust
7.4
/10
Strength Mobile experience
Watch KYC ease
The Online Casino
High Trust
7.4
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch Bonus fairness
1xBet
High Trust
7.1
/10
Strength Mobile experience
Watch KYC ease
GranaWin
High Trust
7.0
/10
Strength Mobile experience
Watch Responsible gambling
Lucky Vibe
Moderate Trust
7.0
/10
Strength Security
Watch Affiliate reputation
Bluefox casino
Moderate Trust
7.0
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch KYC ease
Megapari
Moderate Trust
6.9
/10
Strength Mobile experience
Watch KYC ease
20Bet
Moderate Trust
6.9
/10
Strength Security
Watch Licensing
DragonSlots
Moderate Trust
6.9
/10
Strength Support quality
Watch Transparency
Bizzo Casino
Moderate Trust
6.8
/10
Strength Support quality
Watch Licensing
Slotrave
Moderate Trust
6.6
/10
Strength Mobile experience
Watch Transparency
Linebet
Moderate Trust
6.5
/10
Strength Support quality
Watch Licensing
BC.Game
Moderate Trust
6.4
/10
Strength Affiliate reputation
Watch Bonus fairness
FortunePlay
Moderate Trust
6.4
/10
Strength Website quality
Watch Payment reliability
GoldenPlay
Moderate Trust
6.4
/10
Strength Security
Watch Bonus fairness
National Casino
Moderate Trust
6.4
/10
Strength Mobile experience
Watch KYC ease
Betrino
Moderate Trust
6.2
/10
Strength Licensing
Watch Crypto support
PlayMojo
Moderate Trust
6.2
/10
Strength Website quality
Watch Licensing
Rooster.Bet
Moderate Trust
6.2
/10
Strength Crypto support
Watch Licensing
Luna Casino
Limited Data
6.0
/10
Strength Mobile experience
Watch Bonus fairness
Melbet
Limited Data
5.9
/10
Strength Mobile experience
Watch Complaint response
Spinjo
Limited Data
5.8
/10
Strength Website quality
Watch Bonus fairness
1Win
Limited Data
5.7
/10
Strength Geographic availability
Watch Withdrawal speed
SpinsUP
Limited Data
5.7
/10
Strength Crypto support
Watch Security
Compare Trust Scores
Tick “Compare” on up to 3 operators, then view them side by side.
Methodology
The Trust Index is a proprietary framework that turns documented evidence about an operator into a single 0–10 Trust Score, with the full breakdown shown for every operator. It measures how much you should trust the operator with your money — not how good its welcome offer is.
Gather evidence
Licensing registries, published fee schedules, terms and conditions, and direct testing where possible.
Score 15 dimensions
Each dimension is scored 0–10 by our editorial team, from licensing to crypto support.
Weight and combine
Dimensions that protect your money count more. The Trust Score is the weighted average of the dimensions scored.
Show the working
Every operator shows its dimension scores, when its metrics were last updated and how complete the evidence is.
Each segment is a dimension’s share of the final score when all 15 are scored. Weights total 14.00.
A dimension with no evidence on file is left out of the weighted average — it is never filled with a plausible-looking number.
The Trust Score is recalculated automatically whenever any underlying dimension score changes — for example a new licence, a change in payout behaviour, revised terms, or better evidence for a dimension that was unscored.
It is not a guarantee, a legal opinion, or a judgement on any bonus. It says nothing about whether an operator accepts players in your country, or suits how you play. It reflects the evidence verified so far.
The weights are deliberately uneven, so the factors that protect your money count for more than those that only affect convenience. Each card shows what the dimension covers, why it matters and how much of the final score it carries.
The four dimensions that decide whether you can get your money back.
Covers: Which regulator issued the licence, which activities it actually covers, whether it is active, and how much real oversight that regulator applies.
Why it matters: A licence is the only thing that gives a player somewhere to escalate a dispute. It carries the heaviest weight because everything else — fast payouts, fair bonus terms — is a promise, while a licence is an accountable relationship with a regulator.
Covers: Whether deposits and withdrawals through the listed payment methods work as described, and how consistently.
Why it matters: Depositing is easy at every site. What separates operators is whether the money comes back out the same way it went in, without invented fees or method restrictions appearing at cashout.
Covers: How quickly approved withdrawals are processed and paid, and whether stated timeframes hold up.
Why it matters: Delayed withdrawals are the single most common complaint against online gambling sites. A slow or shifting payout process is often the first visible sign of a cash-flow or compliance problem.
Covers: How an operator handles disputes: whether complaints get answered, escalated, and resolved, and what recourse exists when they are not.
Why it matters: Every operator looks fine while nothing is going wrong. The way a company behaves when a player disputes a decision tells you far more than its marketing does.
Openness, safety and safer-gambling practice.
Covers: How much verifiable information the operator publishes: company details, licence numbers, terms, limits, and fee schedules.
Why it matters: You cannot check what an operator will not disclose. Transparency is what makes every other dimension verifiable rather than taken on faith.
Covers: The technical protection of accounts and data — encryption, account safeguards, and the security posture of the site.
Why it matters: Betting accounts hold identity documents and payment details. A breach is costly even at an otherwise well-run operator.
Covers: Availability and usability of deposit limits, cooling-off periods, self-exclusion, and reality checks.
Why it matters: Safer-gambling tooling is a regulatory baseline in serious jurisdictions. Whether an operator makes these tools easy to find and easy to use says a lot about how it treats its customers.
Weighted lightly because they affect convenience more than protection.
Covers: Channels offered, responsiveness, and whether support can actually resolve account and payment issues.
Why it matters: Support quality matters most on the bad days — a blocked withdrawal or a locked account — not on the good ones.
Covers: Wagering requirements, contribution rules, maximum-bet and expiry conditions, and whether the terms are clear before you claim.
Why it matters: A large headline bonus with a punishing rollover is worth less than a small, clean one. This dimension exists so bonus size alone never buys a good score.
Covers: How the operator treats its affiliate partners and the players they refer — not how much it pays us.
Why it matters: Operators that mistreat referred players, or that are known for disputes with partners, are a warning sign even when their own terms look fine.
Covers: How well the site or app works on a phone: speed, layout, and whether all features are available.
Why it matters: For a large share of players the phone is the only device they use. A cramped or crippled mobile site is a real usability cost.
Covers: Navigation, clarity, performance, and how easily key information (limits, terms, licence) can be found.
Why it matters: Sites that bury their terms are harder to trust. Quality here is mostly about whether you can find what you need to decide.
Covers: How reasonable and predictable identity verification is — what is requested, when, and how long it takes.
Why it matters: Verification is legitimate and required at licensed operators. The problem is unpredictability: a check that appears only at withdrawal, or keeps changing, is a friction and a risk.
Covers: How broadly the operator can lawfully serve players across markets, including where it is licensed to operate.
Why it matters: Availability is only useful where it is legal. This dimension is about real coverage, not about accepting sign-ups from anywhere.
Covers: Which cryptocurrencies are supported and how deposits and withdrawals in them are handled.
Why it matters: For players who use crypto it is a deciding factor; for everyone else it is a minor one, which is why it is weighted lightly.
One global score does not mean the same thing everywhere. An operator’s trust profile depends on the market you are playing in: which licence lets it serve you, whether it is available where you live, the payment methods and currencies it supports locally, the withdrawal options open to you, the regulatory environment, and local responsible-gambling requirements.
Use the market filter in the ranking above to see only the operators we have confirmed as available in a country. Availability is our own country data — it is not licensing advice, and a high global score is not a reason to use an operator where it is not lawful. We publish dedicated market rankings only where we hold enough country-specific evidence, so the list below is the set of markets with at least three tracked operators.
| Market | Operators available | Go deeper |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 25 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| India | 15 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Ireland | 14 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Brazil | 13 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Germany | 10 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Sweden | 9 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| United Kingdom | 9 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Spain | 7 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Nepal | 6 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Cameroon | 5 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) | 5 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Bangladesh | 3 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
| Morocco | 3 | Market guideCasinosBetting sites |
Trust in a betting site comes down to one question: if something goes wrong, will you be treated fairly and get your money back? Everything else is a proxy for that. The signals worth weighing are the ones that can actually be checked.
A licence is the only thing that gives a player a regulator to appeal to. But “licensed” means very different things depending on who issued it, so we disclose the tier rather than treat it as one stamp of approval:
Top-tier regulators
Statutory national or EU-level regulators with mandatory player-protection requirements, active supervision and published enforcement. We currently classify the UK Gambling Commission, the Malta Gaming Authority, Germany’s GGL, the Danish Gambling Authority, the Swedish Gambling Authority and Spain’s DGOJ here.
Established regulators
Long-running regulators with real licensing infrastructure but without the statutory, government-backed powers of a national regulator. The Kahnawake Gaming Commission, operating since 1996, is our example.
Offshore licences
Genuine legal authorisations with lighter-touch oversight and recourse. Curaçao is the best-known example, and is part-way through an overhaul that replaced its old master-licence system in late 2024, alongside newer regulators such as the Tobique Gaming Commission.
Each regulator has its own page on how it works and how to verify a licence — start with the Malta Gaming Authority, UK Gambling Commission and Curaçao guides, or browse all licensing authorities.
Depositing is easy everywhere; what separates operators is whether money comes back out as described. Reliable payments, clear withdrawal limits and processing times that match player experience are the most direct evidence of how an operator behaves under pressure. Delayed withdrawals are among the most common complaints against online gambling sites, which is why payment reliability and withdrawal speed carry heavy weight.
Every operator looks fine while nothing goes wrong. How a company handles a disputed decision — whether it responds, escalates and resolves — tells you far more than its marketing. Whether an independent dispute route exists depends on the licence, which is another reason the regulator matters.
Transparency means an operator publishes what you need to verify its claims: who runs it, its licence number, its terms, its limits and its fees. You cannot check what an operator will not disclose. It is separate from the Trust Score — our Online Casino Transparency Report 2026 measures how much verifiable information operators publish.
Licensed operators are required to verify identity, so a KYC request is not a warning sign. What matters is predictability: checks that are explained up front are normal; checks that appear for the first time at withdrawal, or keep changing, are friction and a risk.
Deposit limits, cooling-off periods, self-exclusion and reality checks are a baseline in serious jurisdictions. How easy an operator makes them to find and use says a lot about how it treats customers.
Yes. A licence is necessary, not sufficient. A licensed operator can still be slow to pay, hard to reach or unclear about its terms — which is why licensing is one weighted dimension of fifteen, not the whole score.
Use the score to shortlist, not to decide. Scores of 8.0 and above are shown in green, 5.0 to 7.9 in amber and below 5.0 in red — a guide to how much scrutiny an operator deserves. Then look at the dimension breakdown to see where an operator is strong or weak, and check the licence and terms for the one you pick. It is different from a star rating on a comparison site, which usually reflects how attractive an offer looks; the Trust Score is built around whether you get your money back.
The Trust Index does the comparative work. These checks take a few minutes and are worth doing for any operator you are about to fund.
Verify the licence yourself. Take the licence number from the footer and search it on the regulator’s own register. Confirm the licensed company, its status and which activities (casino, betting, poker) it covers.
Match the company to the brand. Brands are often trading names. The company named in the terms and conditions should be the one holding the licence.
Read the withdrawal section before the bonus section. Limits per transaction, per week and per month, plus fees and processing times, tell you more about an operator than any welcome offer.
Work out the real cost of a bonus. Multiply the bonus (and the deposit, if the rollover applies to both) by the wagering requirement, then check game contribution, maximum bet and expiry.
Check payment methods work both ways. A method that accepts deposits is not automatically available for withdrawals, and withdrawals often have to return to the deposit method.
Look at how verification works. Licensed operators must verify identity. The question is whether the rules are stated up front and applied predictably.
Find the safer-gambling tools. If you cannot find deposit limits and self-exclusion in a couple of clicks, treat that as information.
Read independent complaint patterns. One unhappy player proves little. The same unresolved payout complaint across several sources proves a lot.
Start small and test a withdrawal early. Deposit a modest amount and withdraw part of it before committing more. Payout behaviour is the real test.
Trust is not bonus size.
Evaluates the operator
Licensing, payment and withdrawal behaviour, complaint handling, transparency, security and safer-gambling practice. It answers: “How much should I trust this company with my money?”
Evaluates one offer
Size, wagering requirement, game contribution, maximum bet and expiry. It answers: “Is this particular offer good value on its terms?”
A large bonus does not make an operator trustworthy — a headline offer is a marketing cost, while a payout is a liability the operator has to honour. And a high Trust Score does not make any particular bonus the best offer: among operators you already trust, the terms matter a great deal.
A sensible order: shortlist by Trust Score, confirm the licence, then compare bonus terms between the operators that pass. Our bonus comparison scores offers on their terms, never on the headline figure alone.
Each AskBigBonus ranking answers a different question. This page answers “which operators can I trust?” — the others narrow by product, payout speed, payment method or licence and draw on the same trust data where it is relevant.
Sportsbook-focused editorial ranking: markets, odds and overall quality for betting.
Casino-focused ranking by casino rating, with country versions.
Trusted Betting Sites (this page)
Trust, safety and transparency across all operators, scored on 15 dimensions.
One question only: how quickly are winnings paid?
Operators ranked for cryptocurrency deposits and withdrawals.
A verified directory of brands authorised by the UK Gambling Commission.
How each regulator works and who it licenses — the source of the licensing dimension.
Offers compared on their real terms, separate from operator trust.
Freshness. Trust scores are reviewed and updated when relevant evidence changes; we do not publish a fixed review schedule. Every operator shows the date its metrics were last updated, and the most recent update across the index was 25 September 2026. The score itself is recalculated automatically when a dimension changes, but the evidence behind it is only as current as its last update, which is why we show the date rather than call the data live.
Data status. Each operator carries one of three labels: fully reviewed (an editor’s verdict is on file), recently updated (metrics refreshed in the last 30 days) or preliminary (scored from metrics only).
Independence and disclosure. Some outbound links are affiliate links and we may be paid if you sign up through them. That relationship does not determine a Trust Score, a ranking position or an editorial verdict, and the affiliate reputation dimension measures how an operator treats its partners and their players, not how much it pays us. See the full methodology, our privacy policy and terms.
Limitations. Not every dimension has been scored for every operator in every market, regulations and terms change, and a score describes an operator, not your circumstances. Confirm current licensing and terms with the operator before you deposit, and gamble only with money you can afford to lose. If gambling is affecting you or someone you know, BeGambleAware offers free, confidential support.
Dated changes we have logged against tracked operators. Not every operator has one, and we do not invent activity to make this list look busier.
The index currently covers 31 operators across 18 published markets, with 271 payment methods and 9 licensing authorities on file.
The AskBigBonus Trust Index is our proprietary 0–10 score for how much you should trust an online betting site or casino with your money. It is a weighted average of 15 separately scored dimensions — licensing, payment reliability, withdrawal speed, complaint response, transparency, security, responsible gambling tools, support, bonus fairness, affiliate reputation, mobile experience, website quality, KYC ease, geographic availability and crypto support. AskBigBonus owns the methodology, maintains the ranking and publishes each operator’s score and breakdown.
Each operator is scored from 0 to 10 on the 15 dimensions by our editorial team, using documented sources such as licensing registries, published fee schedules, terms and conditions and direct testing where possible. The Trust Score is the weighted average of the dimensions that have a score on file — licensing counts most (×2.00), then payment reliability, withdrawal speed and complaint response (×1.50 each). A dimension with no evidence is left out of the average rather than assumed, and the score is recalculated automatically whenever an underlying dimension score changes.
Mainly four things: an active licence from a regulator that actually supervises operators, a track record of paying withdrawals as described, a real way to resolve disputes, and openness about who runs the site and on what terms. Security, responsible gambling tools and reasonable identity checks add to that. No single factor is enough on its own, which is why the Trust Index combines several rather than relying on the licence alone.
Not by itself. Licensing is one of the 15 dimensions and it carries the most weight, but the Trust Score is a blend, so a high score is not a substitute for checking the licence. Always confirm the licence number on the regulator’s own register and that the licensed company matches the one in the terms. Where we have a licence on file, the operator’s card shows which authority issued it.
Yes. Scores are reviewed and updated when relevant evidence changes, and the total is recalculated automatically whenever a dimension score changes. We do not publish a fixed review schedule. Instead, every operator shows the date its metrics were last updated and a data-status label (preliminary, recently updated or fully reviewed), so you can see how fresh the evidence behind a score is.
Yes, and they should. A score can move when a licence is added, suspended or lapses, when payment or withdrawal behaviour changes, when terms change, when complaints are resolved or pile up, or when we obtain better evidence for a dimension that was previously unscored. Dated changes we log against operators appear in the Trust Index updates feed on this page.
No. Some outbound links on AskBigBonus are affiliate links and we may earn a commission if you sign up through them, and we disclose that. That commercial relationship does not determine a Trust Score, a ranking position or an editorial verdict, and an operator cannot pay to change either. The affiliate reputation dimension scores how an operator treats its partners and their players, not how much it pays us.
The Trust Score evaluates the operator: licensing, payment and withdrawal behaviour, complaints, transparency, security and similar factors. A bonus rating evaluates one specific offer: its size, wagering requirement, game contribution, maximum bet and expiry. A large bonus does not make an operator trustworthy, and a high Trust Score does not make a particular bonus the best offer, so we keep the two separate and use both.
Find the licence number in the footer and look it up on the regulator’s own public register, confirm the licensed company matches the one in the terms, and check the licence covers the product you plan to use. Then read the withdrawal limits and bonus terms, look for deposit limits and self-exclusion tools, and start with a small deposit and an early test withdrawal. The checklist on this page walks through each step.
Because trust is not identical in every market. Licensing and legal status differ by country, so does availability, and local payment methods, currencies, withdrawal options and responsible gambling requirements all change what using an operator actually looks like. The market filter shows only operators we have confirmed as available in the country you pick, but availability is not licensing advice — an operator that scores well globally may still not be a legal or sensible choice where you live.
Yes. A licence is necessary, not sufficient. A licensed operator can still be slow to pay, hard to reach when something goes wrong, unclear about its terms or weak on player protection, and the strength of a licence depends on the regulator behind it. That is why licensing is only one weighted dimension of the score and why we show the licence tier alongside it.
It does not tell you whether an operator accepts players in your country, supports your payment method, has odds or games you like, or offers a good bonus. It is also not a guarantee: it reflects the evidence we have verified so far, and an operator marked preliminary has been scored from metrics alone. Use it to shortlist operators, then check the licence and terms for the one you choose.
Open an operator’s full review for its licence, payments, bonus terms and country availability — or compare a shortlist side by side.
AskBigBonus Trust Index™ · Published and maintained by AskBigBonus · Methodology